As The Cookie Crumbles: Debate Ain't Just For Catching Fish...

It was all over the Tubez this morning! HEADLINE: "Rmoney WINS!"

Sub-head: National Kabuki Theatre Wows the Rubes!

In the most recent installment of the Late "Great Debate," the "bar" was set so low for Rmoney's "success" that all he had to do was not step on his dick. 

He didn't; at least, nobody called him on ANY of the numerous occasions when an active moderator-- someone NOT fellating the CorpoRats with his every breath, fearful of giving ANY offense, deferential as a eunuch-- might have added a cautionary follow-up question when faced with Any of a DOZEN or so absolute HOWLERS from the Re-Mitt-ance  Man's repertoire of "zingers," --WHICH statements anyone with the percipience of a coral polyp would have immediately known were as phony as the piety  of a pederast priest.

The aging, feckless, ineffectual, pathetic Jim Lehrer was more toothless than a wanker's sock-puppet. One may only HOPE that Lehrer's done his last prostate-salving lick for the powerful on the national stage. 

St. Barry, the Pallid, PRIMARILY was anxious NOT to give ANY critics ANY grounds to accuse him of being or acting like, or pretending to be, or resembling, in ANY shape or form, an "angry Black man," and (what amounts to the same thing) to persuade the "independents" of his "pragmatism and reasonableness." 
Another word for it is "flannel-mouthed."

It appeared that St. Barry faltered awkwardly, when he could have replied professorially: When he was asked about the role of government, he appeared to be stumped...

On the role of government?

Really? 

That's a total, non-partisan, non-threatening, Constitutional slam-fucking DUNK. Hell, it's a rebound, floor-bounce, off the backboard and through the strings SHOW TIME Dunk, for a former Constitutional Law professor! Or SHOULD be.

All he had to say was: "Here's what the founders thought," and recite the Preamble of the Constitution. It encompasses in just about 50 words everything anybody anytime ever needs to know about the "purpose" of Government, and it goes something like this:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

I mean, seriously? THAT's fucking why we have "government!" How hard izzat?

But the goddam Constitutional Law professor President didn't have a fucking clue? Really? Or he knew, but was afraid to reply?

In either case, that's just fucking pathetic, hippies.

We can measure HOW pathetic when I see you at the beach...